Blog · Choosing a Partner

Choosing an MSP for CMMC: the shared-responsibility questions that matter.

Most providers won't volunteer this, but your MSP is inside your assessment whether they like it or not. The services they run for you are in your scope, an assessor will look at them, and a provider who doesn't understand that is a finding waiting to happen, so pick one who knows it.

Your MSP is in your scope, certified or not

Under the CMMC final rule, an External Service Provider (your MSP or MSSP) that does not process, store, or transmit CUI doesn't need its own CMMC certification. That can sound like an exit ramp, but the services that provider delivers to you are still inside your assessment scope, and assessors will look at them: the admin accounts they hold, the tooling they run, the changes they push into your environment.

If the provider does handle your CUI (hosts it, backs it up, touches it in a ticket), they must meet the requirements as part of your scope. Either way, no reading of the rules makes your MSP's competence somebody else's problem. When you pick an MSP, you're choosing who sits next to you when a C3PAO starts asking questions.

The Shared Responsibility Matrix is table stakes

A Shared Responsibility Matrix (SRM) answers one question for each of the 110 requirements: who owns it? It records, in writing and with signatures, which requirements the MSP owns, which you own, and which are shared. That turns "our MSP handles security" from a hopeful sentence into evidence an assessor can actually use.

If a provider won't sign one, that's your answer, and you shouldn't treat it as an opening position or a yellow flag to revisit next quarter. A provider unwilling to put their name next to specific requirements is telling you how they'll behave when the assessor's interview schedule comes out. The matrix also shows that even in the most generous split, a substantial share of the 110 stays in your column or the shared one. That split reflects the work itself, and a provider who shows it to you up front is one you can plan around.

Questions to ask before you sign

What changes when your MSP touches CUI

 MSP handles your CUIMSP doesn't touch CUI
Their certification obligationMust meet requirements as part of your scopeNo CMMC cert of their own required
Your assessment impactTheir people, systems, and processes get assessed alongside yoursTheir services are still in your scope, and assessors will look at them
What to demandSigned SRM, evidence access, presence at assessmentSigned SRM and proof their access paths can't touch CUI

Red flags that should end the conversation

"We make you compliant." No, they don't. Compliance is always shared and can't be outsourced whole: your policies, your people, and your physical controls stay yours no matter who runs the firewall. A provider selling turnkey compliance is selling you a sentence you'll have to retract in an interview.

The rest of the list is short. Walk away from a provider with no SRM, for the reasons above, or with only commercial Microsoft experience when your environment needs more. Per-ticket security is the last one: if defending your scope is billed like a printer jam, it will get the urgency of a printer jam.

Every one of these red flags comes from the same place: a provider who treats CMMC as your project to bill against, when they actually live inside your scope. See how we structure it differently in our solutions, or start with a gap assessment that maps which requirements your current provider actually covers. The list is usually shorter than the sales deck implied.

Ask us the hard questions

Interview an MSP that's already passed the exam.

Bring the checklist above to a strategy call and ask us every question on it: SRM, GCC High, assessment-day presence, exit terms. We'll answer in writing. Or email rj@indirectit.com directly.